![]() That's why they came up with their tech strategy." "That's precisely the situation the Chinese wanted to get out of. "In the 1970s and '80s China was exporting minerals to us to make higher-value goods," Nakano explained. Not anymore: Beijing is trying to do that work in-house. The refined materials would get shipped out to the US or Europe where they would then be transformed into batteries. In the past, this is where the Chinese value chain would end. "It's very difficult for private-sector non-state-supported entities to plan ahead." "At the end of the day even if DC or Brussels or Tokyo manages to support competing suppliers of minerals and companies that can turn minerals and metals into components, the mineral commodity markets are hard to predict," Jane Nakano, a senior fellow in the Energy Security and Climate Change Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told me. This would not have been possible without Beijing's willingness to pay whatever price and withstand whatever losses it took to build the industry. ![]() By 2019, Chinese companies made up 80% of the world's output for battery materials. ![]() And once these minerals are pulled out of the ground, they are shipped to Chinese-owned refineries that transform the metals for use in the final product. invested about $4.3 billion in lithium mines internationally, according to the research firm S&P Capital IQ. From 2018 to the first half of 2021, China Inc. has negotiated ownership stakes and partnerships with mines all over the world. Most of these minerals lie outside China - in countries such as Chile, Australia, Bolivia, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The plan starts at the most basic level of battery production: raw materials like cobalt, lithium, manganese, and nickel. Despite its long, formal-sounding name, the document sets out a clear goal: to corner the market for key materials like lithium, cobalt, and nickel invest in their extraction and build factories for battery manufacturing. Beijing's battery planĬhina has been working to dominate the battery space since at least 2015, when the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party crafted the National Key Research and Development Program New Energy Vehicle Key Special Implementation Plan. The winner of the battery war will not only control the electric-vehicle market but also produce thousands of jobs, control the future of mobility, and dictate the West's ability to transition to greener forms of energy. Beijing is boosting its homegrown products, and foreign automakers - which already need China Inc.'s batteries to build more EVs - are losing market share. But as China's domestic electric-vehicle market takes off, the tables have turned. For the past 40 years China needed foreign automakers to help develop its own car industry through joint ventures. It is an increasingly fraught partnership, even setting geopolitics aside. Until US automakers can source batteries domestically, or from friendly nations, they will depend on maintaining good relations with Beijing. And without cheap batteries to power fleets of cheap electric vehicles, he argued, companies like GM and Ford "run the risk of becoming regional players and losing their international status." "The danger is that we won't have a domestic battery sector and we will totally in perpetuity rely on China to build cells for us," Tu Le, the founder of the consultancy Sino Auto Insights, told me. dominate in every aspect of the development of batteries for electric vehicles, from the mining and refining of raw materials to the manufacture of the batteries themselves. China's state-supported enterprises - let's call them China Inc. In the latter battle there is one area where the US has fallen woefully behind: batteries. But at the same time, one of the relationship's most salient features is that it is a contest for control over the technology that will define the 21st century. On one hand, diplomats are trying furiously to maintain a stable world and keep money flowing between the two countries. In recent years, the relationship between the US and China - the world's economic superpowers - has devolved into an unwieldy tug-of-war between economic interdependence and deep-seated distrust. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |